Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement
The International Journal of Molecular Oncology (IJMO) is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and academic integrity. The journal takes all reasonable steps to prevent publication malpractice and ensures that all stakeholders involved in the publication process adhere to ethical principles and professional standards.
This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.
Ethical Framework
IJMO follows internationally accepted ethical guidelines and best practices for scholarly publishing. The journal is dedicated to maintaining transparency, accountability, and trust in the scientific record.
Responsibilities of Authors
Authors submitting manuscripts to IJMO must ensure that:
-
The submitted work is original and has not been published or submitted elsewhere
-
All data and results are accurately reported and honestly interpreted
-
Proper acknowledgment of all sources and contributions is provided
-
All listed authors meet accepted authorship criteria and approve the final manuscript
-
Any conflicts of interest and sources of funding are fully disclosed
Research Ethics
-
Studies involving human participants must comply with ethical standards and include informed consent and ethics committee approval
-
Animal studies must follow institutional and international guidelines for ethical animal research
-
Ethical approval statements must be included in the manuscript
Misconduct
Plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, duplicate submission, and inappropriate authorship practices are strictly prohibited. The journal uses plagiarism detection tools to screen all submissions.
Responsibilities of Editors
Editors of the International Journal of Molecular Oncology are responsible for:
-
Making publication decisions based on scientific merit, originality, and relevance
-
Ensuring a fair, unbiased, and timely peer review process
-
Maintaining confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
-
Managing conflicts of interest appropriately
-
Investigating suspected ethical misconduct and taking necessary corrective actions
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to:
-
Conduct reviews objectively, constructively, and confidentially
-
Declare any conflicts of interest
-
Identify relevant prior work not cited by the authors
-
Refrain from using unpublished material for personal benefit
Peer Review Integrity
IJMO employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartial evaluation of manuscripts. Reviewer identities and editorial communications are treated as confidential throughout the review process.
Conflicts of Interest
All authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence the evaluation or interpretation of a manuscript.
Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern
When errors or ethical issues are identified after publication:
-
Corrections are issued for honest errors that do not invalidate the findings
-
Retractions are issued for serious ethical breaches or unreliable data
-
Expressions of concern may be published while investigations are ongoing
All actions are taken transparently to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.
Data Access and Reproducibility
Authors may be asked to provide original data or supporting materials for editorial review. IJMO encourages data transparency and reproducibility to support reliable scientific research.
Handling of Complaints and Appeals
The International Journal of Molecular Oncology takes allegations of misconduct seriously. Complaints and appeals are investigated objectively, confidentially, and in accordance with established ethical standards.
Commitment to Ethical Publishing
The International Journal of Molecular Oncology is dedicated to ethical publishing practices and continuous improvement of editorial standards, ensuring the credibility and reliability of published research in molecular oncology and precision medicine.